October 31, 2007

Dynamic neural correlates of consciousness

EEG,fMRI,neuroimaging,perception — thomasr @ 3:27 am

PLOS Biology has a most interesting article from Stanislas Dehaene‘s group on the neurodynamics of conscious experience. The researchers studied brain activation using EEG, while subjects rated visually presented stimuli on a scale from unseen to clearly seen. It was found that conscious experience of a stimulus was related to the engagement of a widespread network involving the frontal, parietal and temporal cortices.

SCR note: It is mentioning a recent study using fMRI (Christensen et al. 2006) provided comparable results, and adding two factors; (1) the conscious experience of a visual stimulus involved activation of both thalami, and (2) subjects consistently rated some experiences as vague, i.e., as “detected but not identified”. This experience was associated with both lower activation in those regions involved in conscious experience, and unique activation of additional regions, including some prefrontal regions.

Read more... Comments (2)Print This Post

August 31, 2007

Final proof of role of neural coherence in consciousness?

neuralsynchrony.jpgMelloni et al. have recently demonstrated, in the Journal of Neuroscience, that neural synchrony in the gamma range between distal rain regions is important for conscious perception. The authors say about their work that “the access to conscious perception is the early transient global increase of phase synchrony of oscillatory activity in the gamma frequency range”

Here we link to the article and some related works.

Read more... Comments (0)Print This Post

July 15, 2007

Attention and consciousness: two distinct brain processes

attention,perception — alice @ 10:09 pm

Abstract of Attention and consciousness: two distinct brain processes, in TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences.

The close relationship between attention and consciousness has led many scholars to conflate these processes. This article summarizes psychophysical evidence, arguing that top-down attention and consciousness are distinct phenomena that need not occur together and that can be manipulated using distinct paradigms. Subjects can become conscious of an isolated object or the gist of a scene despite the near absence of top-down attention; conversely, subjects can attend to perceptually invisible objects. Furthermore, top-down attention and consciousness can have opposing effects. Such dissociations are easier to understand when the different functions of these two processes are considered. Untangling their tight relationship is necessary for the scientific elucidation of consciousness and its material substrate.

For full access to this paper, click here.

Read more... Comments (1)Print This Post

June 12, 2007

Visual hallucinations in brain recovery

brain injury,perception — thomasr @ 9:02 am

vis_stroke.jpgAs if it was not bad enough to suffer from a brain injury following such as stroke, many sufferers of injury to visual areas also report experiences of hallucinations.

Interestingly, these reports should not necessarily be understood as the result of neuropathology or as unimportant symptoms, but rather as the result of functional reorganization – aka plasticity – of the neural underpinnings of visual perception.

Visual hallucinations during spontaneous and training-induced visual field recovery

D.A. Poggel et al.

Neuropsychologia
Volume 45, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 2598-2607

Visual hallucinations after post-geniculate visual system lesions were shown to be associated with spontaneous recovery of visual functions. We investigated the occurrence of hallucinations during spontaneous recovery and additionally tested whether hallucinations were re-instated in a phase of vision restoration therapy (VRT). Nineteen patients with post-geniculate lesions and homonymous visual loss participated in a prospective study, and 121 patients with various lesions were included in a retrospective study using a questionnaire including verbal descriptions as well as drawings of hallucinations experienced by the patients. In both samples, visual-field size was determined before and after 6 months of VRT. Many patients in both groups experienced post-lesion hallucinations (mostly colors, objects, motion) which subsided after spontaneous recovery of visual functions (increase of visual field size, recovery of more complex visual function) was ended. Hallucinations re-emerged during training. However, the majority of patients reported simple, unformed visual hallucinations (uncolored phosphenes, spots, flashes), especially when visual field recovery was most intense. Hallucinations were mainly found in patients with large shifts of the visual field border. They occurred in blind areas, particularly in areas of residual vision where recovery was predominantly observed. Hallucinations may reflect functional recovery in partially lesioned brain areas. While the colored/formed hallucinations during spontaneous recovery may represent non-specific activation of higher visual areas, the simple, unformed training-related hallucinations may indicate recovery in the primary visual cortex during treatment. Hallucinations should not generally be discarded as pathological or unimportant symptoms, but they may be functional indicators of visual system plasticity.

ScienceDirect

Read more... Comments (1)Print This Post

June 4, 2007

Early Neural Correlates of Conscious Somatosensory Perception

perception — alice @ 11:11 pm

Abstract of Early Neural Correlates of Conscious Somatosensory Perception, in the Journal of Neuroscience.

The cortical processing of consciously perceived and unperceived somatosensory stimuli is thought to be identical during the first 100 –120 ms after stimulus onset. Thereafter, the electrophysiological correlates of conscious perception have been shown to be reflected in the N1 component of the evoked response as well as in later (_200 ms) nonstimulus-locked _-band (28 –50 Hz) oscillatory activity. To evaluate more specifically the time course and correlation of neuronal oscillations with conscious perception, we recorded neuromagnetic responses to threshold-intensity somatosensory stimuli. We show here that cortical broadband activities phase locked to the subsequently perceived stimuli in somatosensory, frontal, and parietal regions as early as 30 –70 ms from stimulus onset, whereas the phase locking to the unperceived stimuli was weak and primarily restricted to somatosensory regions. Such stimulus locking also preceded the perceived stimuli, indicating that the phase of ongoing cortical activities biases subsequent perception. Furthermore, the data show that the stimulus locking was present in the _- (4–8 Hz), _- (8 –14 Hz), _- (14 –28 Hz), and _- (28–40 Hz) frequency bands, of which the widespread _-band component was dominant for the consciously perceived stimuli but virtually unobservable for the unperceived stimuli. Our results show that the neural correlates of conscious perception are already found during the earliest stages of cortical processing from 30 to 150 ms after stimulus onset and suggest that _-frequency-band oscillations have a role in the neural mechanisms of sensory awareness.

Read more... Comments (0)Print This Post

April 17, 2007

Consciousness in the Single Neuron

SCR Feature,neuroscience,perception — alice @ 11:45 am

20070401.jpg

Read more... Comments (4)Print This Post

April 6, 2007

Can blindsight lead to superior sight?

blindsight2.jpgIn a most interesting paper by Ceri Trevethan, Arash Sahraie and Larry Weiskrantz, it is suggested that blindsight patients are actually superior on certain visual stimulus detection tasks. In this paper, published in Cognition, the authors also provide experimental evidence that this is indeed the case.

The study highlights the neural dynamics that take place in the case of brain damage. While the areas that are damaged have been responsible for a given task (i.e. vision) it is likely that such injury leads to unmasking of previously suppressed functions in adjacent or other connected areas. As such, brain damage might indeed not only lead to reduced functions, but unmasking — and enhancement — of other functions. As in this study,

Read more... Comments (0)Print This Post

April 4, 2007

Event perceptions

perception,phenomenology,theory — thomasr @ 2:11 pm

goossensflowoftime_jpg2.jpgSo how do we really experience the world around us, and events as they occur? As discrete units of experiences or as one flow of experience. In a recent paper in Psychologial Bulletin authors Jeffrey Sacks and colleagues suggest that we perceive and conceive of activity in terms of discrete events, and that the perception of boundaries between events arises from ongoing perceptual processing. The elaboration of this view and  accompanying consequences are laid out in this paper. Here we link to the abstract as well as the manuscript.

Read more... Comments (0)Print This Post

February 8, 2007

Pain in the brain

EEG,brain imaging,fMRI,pain,perception — thomasr @ 5:21 am

index_pain.gifPain is one of the most prominent examples of the problem of consciousness: from a subjective point of view we know the experience of pain all too well. Seen from the objective side of pain, the neural processes related to pain are becoming unravelled. But the essential relationship between neural processes going on from the sensation to the experience are much less known.

In a study by Christmann and colleagues, a combination of EEG and fMRI demonstrates how regional brain areas make different contributions — and at different times — to the experience of pain.

Read more... Comments (1)Print This Post

February 5, 2007

Prosthetic arm with a feel

illusion,neuroscience,perception — thomasr @ 5:34 pm

Prosthetic arm with a feelSurgeons have managed to give an amputee not only a prosthetic arm that moves as directed by her thoughts, but also the feeling of touch — albeit in the wrong part of her body.

When Claudia Mitchell presses an area on her chest, where surgeons re-wired the nerves that used to run to her hand, it feels to her as if her fingers are being touched.

The technique opens the door to additional technologies that could one day relay signals from the prosthesis back to the ‘fingers’ on the chest, allowing an amputee to get sensory information such as touch and temperature from their artificial limb.

Mitchell’s success story was revealed in a press conference last year, but now the details have been published: they are reported this week in the Lancet. (from Nature)

Read more... Comments (3)Print This Post

February 2, 2007

On becoming aware of what you eat

perception,reviews,theory — thomasr @ 7:42 pm

plate_food.jpgA recent review article explores how we become aware of the (integrated) flavor of food. Abstract: In recent years, progress has been made understanding the neural correlates of consciousness. Experimental and computational data have been largely based on the visual system. Contemporary neurobiological frameworks of consciousness are reviewed, concluding that neural reverberation among forward- and back-projecting neural ensembles across brain areas is a common theme.

In an attempt to extrapolate these concepts to the oral-sensory and olfactory systems involved with multimodal flavor perception, the integration of the sensory information of which into a flavor gestalt has been reviewed elsewhere. The neurocognitive bases of human multimodal food perception: Sensory integration. I reconceptualize the flavor-sensory system by integrating it into a larger neural system termed the Homeostatic Interoceptive System (HIS). This system consists of an oral (taste, oral touch, etc.) and non-oral part (non oral-thermosensation, pain, etc.) which are anatomically and functionally highly similar. Consistent with this new concept and with a large volume of experimental data, I propose that awareness of intraoral food is related to the concomitant reverberant self-sustained activation of a coalition of neuronal subsets in agranular insula and orbitofrontal cortex (affect, hedonics) and agranular insula and perirhinal cortex (food identity), as well as the amygdala (affect and identity) in humans. I further discuss the functional anatomy in relation essential nodes. These formulations are by necessity to some extent speculative.

Read more... Comments (0)Print This Post

February 1, 2007

What do we hear with our eyes?

Would we hear things differently if we always kept our eyes closed? The answer is yes! The McGurk Effect is a classic illustration of how the spoken sounds we hear are influenced by whether or not we can see the speaker’s lips.

Click here for a great online example of the McGurk Effect. In this online example, we see a person saying (making lip movements for) “GA GA”, but in reality, we are hearing “BA BA”. When these sounds and lip movements are combined, most adults think that they are hearing “DA DA”.

Read more... Comments (1)Print This Post


January 17, 2007

A Neurobiology of Sensitivity? Sentience as the Foundation for Unusual Conscious Perception

200701021.jpg
Read more... Comments (20)Print This Post

January 15, 2007

The Illusion Contest 2007 — submissions

cognitive science,illusion,perception — thomasr @ 2:56 am

illusion-a19.gifIt’s time for this year’s Illusion Contest.

The 2007 Contest Gala will be held in Sarasota, Florida (Van Wezel Performing Arts Hall) on Saturday, May 12th, 2007, during the week of the Vision Sciences Society (VSS) conference.

The 2006 annual contest, also held in Sarasota, Florida, was a huge success, which drew numerous accolades from attendees as well as international media coverage. The First, Second and Third Prize winners were Max Dursteler (Universitätsspital Zürich, Switzerland), Peter Tse (Dartmouth College, USA), and Gideon Caplovitz & Peter Tse (Dartmouth College, USA). To see the illusions, photo galleries and other highlights from the 2006 contest, go here.

Read more... Comments (1)Print This Post

December 30, 2006

Visuo-spatial consciousness and parieto-occipital EEGs

Which brain areas are involved in visuospatial consciousness? In a recent study by Babiloni and colleagues, subjects performed a visual perception task. Interestingly, these scientists found that visual-evoked potentials at parieto-occipital areas had the same peak latencies for cases of conscious, as well as unconscious, perception. These visual-evoked potentials were located to the occipital (BA 19) and parietal (BA 7) cortices.

Source strength was significantly stronger in consciously, compared to unconsciously, perceived cases at about +300 ms poststimulus. Babiloni and colleagues concluded that these features of the observed parieto-occipital activation might be connected to visuospatial consciousness.

Read more... Comments (0)Print This Post

December 29, 2006

Genetic Mechanism Helps Explain Chronic Pain Disorders

genetics,pain,perception — thomasr @ 7:09 am

painbrain.jpegResearchers at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill have discovered that commonly occurring variations of a gene trigger a domino effect in chronic pain disorders. The finding might lead to more effective treatments for temporomandibular joint disorder (TMJD) and other chronic pain conditions.

Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT), an enzyme that metabolizes neurotransmitters such as epinephrine, norepinephrine and dopamine and that has been implicated in the modulation of persistent pain, as well as cognition and mood, is regulated by a gene, also called COMT. Previous UNC-led research showed that common genetic variants of this gene are associated with increased pain sensitivity and the likelihood of developing TMJD.

Read more... Comments (0)Print This Post

December 22, 2006

Inducing a dreamy state

braineletrodes.jpgBrain stimulation provides an interesting tool to study the functions of a given area of the brain. In a study by Vignal et al. published in Brain, artificial stimulation or seizures in specific mesial temporal lobe structures were assessed both in terms of location and phenomenology.

Among the findings, the researchers found that “Forty-five per cent of dreamy states were evoked by stimulation of the amygdala, 37.5% by the hippocampus and 17.5% by the para-hippocampal gyrus.”

Furthermore, they found that their study “demonstrates the existence of large neural networks that produce recall of memories via activation of the hippocampus, amygdala and rhinal cortex.”

Read more... Comments (2)Print This Post

December 17, 2006

The mutation that takes away pain

genetics,pain,perception — thomasr @ 4:34 pm

headache.jpgImagine being unable to feel any pain at all. For a tiny handful of people, that is the reality — and medical researchers have now pinpointed the mutation that removes their ability to perceive painful sensations.The study began when doctors in northern Pakistan examined a remarkable group of related families in which several individuals seem entirely unaffected by pain. Their attention was first attracted by one member of the clan, a locally famous boy who performed street theatre involving walking on burning coals and stabbing his arms with knives.Although it sounds like a party trick, the condition is devastating, as sufferers don’t learn to know their limits. The street-performing boy killed himself on his fourteenth birthday after jumping off a house roof. The researchers studied six of his relatives, aged between 4 and 14 years. All had suffered many cuts and bruises, and injuries to lips and tongue caused by biting themselves; several had fractured bones without noticing.

Read more... Comments (0)Print This Post

The impact of invisible stimuli

invisible.png

The more clear a stimulus is, the more distracting it can be. Or so you might think. In a recent Science publiation Tsushima et al. report that weak stimuli that are irrelevant to the task being performed—have
a greater impact than strong, easily noticeable distractors.

Read more... Comments (1)Print This Post

October 21, 2006

When Just One Sense Is Available, Multisensory Experience Fills in the Blanks

phone.jpgA new article is out describing how we use our senses to fill out the blanks when we are only provided with input from one modality. Talking in a phone is a good example. Here, we are only provided with the auditory input. In a new study, it seems that knowing the face of who you’re talking to helps recognizing the people you are talking to.

 

Read more... Comments (0)Print This Post
« Previous PageNext Page »