<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How good are you at Self-Control?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sciconrev.org/2008/11/how-good-are-you-at-self-control/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sciconrev.org/2008/11/how-good-are-you-at-self-control/</link>
	<description>News from the Scientific Study of Consciousness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alain Morin</title>
		<link>http://sciconrev.org/2008/11/how-good-are-you-at-self-control/comment-page-1/#comment-284171</link>
		<dc:creator>Alain Morin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 06:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciconrev.org/?p=1079#comment-284171</guid>
		<description>In response to the comment made above:
(1) It is indeed good to remind us that working memory is made up of both a verbal component (inner speech) and a visuo-spatial component (imagery). In my SCR Feature I deliberately simplified the picture and exclusively focused on the potential link between  the verbal component of working memory and self-regulation. It thus remains possible that imagery too plays an active role in self-regulation/control.  Note here (a) that my argument  has never been that «self-control equates to greater capacity for self-talk», but rather that «inner speech promotes self-control», and (b) to my knowledge, research showing a link between visuo-spatial skills and self-regulation is non-existent.

(2) Cognitive therapy (e.g., Beck’s work, as well as Meichembaum’s, Ellis’, etc.) does not suggest that self-talk per se is detrimental to self-control. Instead, it shows that some individuals misuse inner speech by either overusing it or by distorting it (by engaging in negative thought patterns), which leads to poor self-regulation indeed. These individuals are «self-ruminators» as opposed to «self-reflectors» -- see Trapnell and Campbell (1999). Healthy use of inner speech translates into highly effective self-regulation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to the comment made above:<br />
(1) It is indeed good to remind us that working memory is made up of both a verbal component (inner speech) and a visuo-spatial component (imagery). In my SCR Feature I deliberately simplified the picture and exclusively focused on the potential link between  the verbal component of working memory and self-regulation. It thus remains possible that imagery too plays an active role in self-regulation/control.  Note here (a) that my argument  has never been that «self-control equates to greater capacity for self-talk», but rather that «inner speech promotes self-control», and (b) to my knowledge, research showing a link between visuo-spatial skills and self-regulation is non-existent.</p>
<p>(2) Cognitive therapy (e.g., Beck’s work, as well as Meichembaum’s, Ellis’, etc.) does not suggest that self-talk per se is detrimental to self-control. Instead, it shows that some individuals misuse inner speech by either overusing it or by distorting it (by engaging in negative thought patterns), which leads to poor self-regulation indeed. These individuals are «self-ruminators» as opposed to «self-reflectors» &#8212; see Trapnell and Campbell (1999). Healthy use of inner speech translates into highly effective self-regulation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whit</title>
		<link>http://sciconrev.org/2008/11/how-good-are-you-at-self-control/comment-page-1/#comment-284148</link>
		<dc:creator>whit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 17:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciconrev.org/?p=1079#comment-284148</guid>
		<description>How do you factor in the research showing that visuo-spatial working memory and verbal working memory are separable capacities (see Robert Logie&#039;s work)? So for instance, if your WMC test is &quot;keeping several words in mind while doing math problems,&quot; have you determined whether the subject&#039;s strategy with math is primarily verbal or visuo-spatial? If the WMC capacity test is effectively finding greater visuo-spatial working memory, rather than verbal, then it might be that self-control more correlates with a capacity for &quot;vision&quot; of goals than &quot;self-talk&quot; of goals. Until you disambiguate this, the argument that self-control equates to greater capacity for self-talk isn&#039;t strong. 

You also should contend with Aaron Beck&#039;s findings suggesting that self-talk, lodged presumably in working memory, often leads to a neurotic lack of self-control, which can be improved precisely by training subjects to gain psychological distance from the self-talk - what his well-proven &quot;cognitive therapy&quot; consists in.

In folk psychology, of course, inner speech just is self-control, and there&#039;s a homunculus over there producing it, or is it that we&#039;re supposed to be the homunculus? All the standard arguments against a homunculus need to be disarmed, perhaps by better separating your claim from the folk psychological picture.

Also, even if better self-control capacity correlates with better verbal (as compared to visuo-spatial) working memory capacity, you need to show that it isn&#039;t the other way around: that better self-control capacity produces better working memory capacity. Keeping something within working memory is itself arguably an instance of self-control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you factor in the research showing that visuo-spatial working memory and verbal working memory are separable capacities (see Robert Logie&#8217;s work)? So for instance, if your WMC test is &#8220;keeping several words in mind while doing math problems,&#8221; have you determined whether the subject&#8217;s strategy with math is primarily verbal or visuo-spatial? If the WMC capacity test is effectively finding greater visuo-spatial working memory, rather than verbal, then it might be that self-control more correlates with a capacity for &#8220;vision&#8221; of goals than &#8220;self-talk&#8221; of goals. Until you disambiguate this, the argument that self-control equates to greater capacity for self-talk isn&#8217;t strong. </p>
<p>You also should contend with Aaron Beck&#8217;s findings suggesting that self-talk, lodged presumably in working memory, often leads to a neurotic lack of self-control, which can be improved precisely by training subjects to gain psychological distance from the self-talk &#8211; what his well-proven &#8220;cognitive therapy&#8221; consists in.</p>
<p>In folk psychology, of course, inner speech just is self-control, and there&#8217;s a homunculus over there producing it, or is it that we&#8217;re supposed to be the homunculus? All the standard arguments against a homunculus need to be disarmed, perhaps by better separating your claim from the folk psychological picture.</p>
<p>Also, even if better self-control capacity correlates with better verbal (as compared to visuo-spatial) working memory capacity, you need to show that it isn&#8217;t the other way around: that better self-control capacity produces better working memory capacity. Keeping something within working memory is itself arguably an instance of self-control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

