http://sciconrev.org/2003/04/empirical-constraints-on-the-concept-of-consciousness/ News from the Scientific Study of Consciousness Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:01:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 http://sciconrev.org/2003/04/empirical-constraints-on-the-concept-of-consciousness/comment-page-1/#comment-20969 Abdu "The One" Sun, 25 Mar 2007 14:17:20 +0000 http://sci-con.org/index.php/2003/04/empirical-constraints-on-the-concept-of-consciousness/#comment-20969 I suppose that: 1)The above picture is rich with philosophy.It is a success. 2)'The "inner self" or the "inner experience",that is qualitative phenomenal experience' is better detected via unusual subjective phenomenal experience similar to the one which seems so far that only "The One" enjoys. His will be explained when given the opportunity he is now seeking. Therefore, wish him good luck to win the required opportunity if you want to have an idea about a new theory to be called the "RRR". I appologize for using this style of suspense when I talk about a theory. I do not mean to make an advertisment of it, but rather to encourage those people in charge not to lose the opportunity. The "RRR" theory will minimize much of the suffering of many (if there are many) people concerned with consciousness. It will deal with e.g ("the redness of the red") just in a new way that has never been thought of except when one wants to describe it as an "impossibility". For instance: Michael tye's statement quoted above (all of its components). 3)NCC "serve a representational function". My comment here is one word: TRUE. 4)Conclusion: My notion is one of the first steps on the street made with the two sides of philosophy and science. Please put off your wow for a while. I suppose that:
1)The above picture is rich with philosophy.It is a success.
2)’The “inner self” or the “inner experience”,that is qualitative
phenomenal experience’ is better detected via unusual subjective phenomenal
experience similar to the one which seems so far that only “The
One” enjoys. His will be explained when given the opportunity he is now seeking. Therefore, wish him good luck to win the required opportunity if you want to have an idea about a new theory to be called the “RRR”. I appologize for using this style of suspense when I talk about a theory. I do not mean to make an advertisment of it, but rather to encourage those people in charge not to lose the opportunity. The “RRR” theory will minimize much of the suffering of many (if there are many) people concerned with consciousness. It will deal with e.g (”the redness of the red”) just in a new way that has never been thought of except when one wants to describe it as an “impossibility”. For instance: Michael tye’s statement quoted above (all of its components).
3)NCC “serve a representational function”. My comment here is one word: TRUE.
4)Conclusion: My notion is one of the first steps on the street made with the two sides of philosophy and science. Please put off your wow for a while.

]]>